THE THIRD FIFTEENTH-CENTURY COOKERY BOOK: A NEWLY IDENTIFIED GROUP WITHIN A FAMILY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a discussion of what I identify as the 'family' groupings of medieval English culinary collections,1 I indicated that traits which identify recipes as coming from the same collection are their similar, or identical, wording and 'the way in which they occur in the same order - or, sometimes, roughly the same order as groups' (p. 17). One of the 'families' I identified was the group edited by Thomas Austin in the EETS Two Fifteenth-Century Cookery-Books,2 consisting of London, British Library, MSS Harley 279 and Harley 4016, collated with, respectively, Oxford, Bodleian Library, MSS Ashmole 1439 and Douce 55.Austin's 'two' cookery bookdsHarley 279 and Ashmole 1439 are very closely parallel, sharing much the same division titles and containing most of the same recipes in the same order. That is, under the heading 'Potage' (Harley 279's 'Potages dyvers'), Ashmole 1439 gives 152 of Harley 279's 153 recipes; under the next heading, 'Leche Viaunde', appear all sixty-four of Harley 279's recipes under that heading, and under 'Viaundes Furnes' are thirty-three of Harley 279's forty-four 'Dyverse Bake Metis' - the Ashmole scribe was apparently working from an exemplar which was missing a sheet here. To these three headings, Ashmole adds a fourth, 'Sauces pur diverse viaundes', containing the nineteen sauce recipes Austin printed in a separate section of his edition; most of these sauces appear in Harley 4016, not Harley 279. Aside from this addition, Harley 279 and Ashmole 1435 are one and the same 'cookery book'.Harley 4016, on the other hand, is not the same collection, but it is of the same 'family' because it contains many of the same recipes, about half the recipes of Harley 279 making up about half of the contents of Harley 4016. For example, Harley 279's recipe for 'Vele, kede, or henne in Bokenade', p. 13, xxxvj, reads:Both of these recipes are followed by an alternative recipe for the same dish, 279's 'Autre Vele en bokenade' and 4016's 'Auter maner buknade', but these are entirely different recipes, with different wording and strikingly different ingredients. Harley 279's reads:MS 4016 gives an equally long but somewhat simpler recipe, obviously not an elaboration of the earlier recipe:Take rawe Almondes, and blanche hem, and grynde hem, and draw hem thorgh a streynour with fresh broth and wyne into good stiff mylke; And then take veel, kyde, or hen, and parboile hem in fressh brothe, and pike hem clene, and cast him thereto; take Clowes, maces, and herbes, and lete hem boile ynowe; And then caste a litull Sugur, pouder ginger, and salt, and serue him forth.About all this has in common with the Harley 279 recipe is that both thicken with almond milk rather than the egg yolks called for in the previous recipe.The order of recipes in Harley 279 and 4016 is quite different. Unlike Harley 279 and Ashmole 1439, Harley 4016 has no subdivisions, and there is no perceptible rationale for its arrangement. An initial small group of pottages and stews is followed by fritters, pies, and tarts; a group of sauces follows, then directions for roasting various birds. Next we get various directions for roasting and stewing meats, followed by miscellaneous recipes: some fairly elaborate meat-based dishes such as 'Blamanger' and 'Gely' interspersed with eggs, shellfish, crepes, more fritters, and a lot more, including some for vegetables and fruits. Finally there is a sizeable group of fish recipes and, at the end, two more recipes for sweet dishes.Austin was, then, quite correct in considering Harley 4016 to be a separate cookbook, despite the considerable overlap of its contents with 279. But the manuscript he used to collate it with, Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Douce 55, is, like Harley 279, only a partial parallel. Most of the recipes in Douce 55 are parallel to recipes in Harley 4016, but by no means all, and the order of the recipes in Douce 55 is entirely different from that in Harley 4016, which, as noted above, has no discernible rationale. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".