MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521804417

A novel reduced-size 60-GHz 180 degrees coupler using LG-CPW transmission lines

2011· article· en· W2521804417 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia-Pacific Microwave Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReturn lossMicrostripRat-race couplerCoplanar waveguideMaterials scienceElectrical impedanceHybrid couplerInsertion lossTransceiverOptoelectronicsFrequency bandElectrical engineeringMicrowaveOpticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)Power dividers and directional couplersEngineeringCMOSAntenna (radio)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A compact reduced size 60-GHz band (57-64 GHz ) 180 degrees coupler is proposed and implemented in an IPD (Integrated Passive Devices) technology. A size reduction of 75% compared to a conventional 180 degrees coupler has been obtained by using high impedance lower-ground coplanar waveguide (LG-CPW) transmission lines loaded with microstrip opencircuited stubs. The measured results of the coupler showed an amplitude imbalance of less than 0.5 dB and a phase variation from 187 degrees to 184 degrees over a frequency range of 57-64 GHz. The measured return loss is better than 15 dB and the isolation is greater than 24 dB over the frequency band of interest. The measured results confirm the potential of the proposed coupler for low-cost, high-performance, small-size transceiver front-ends for high data rate wireless systems operating in the unlicensed 60-band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it