MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521804417

A novel reduced-size 60-GHz 180 degrees coupler using LG-CPW transmission lines

2011· article· en· W2521804417 on OpenAlexaff
Ibrahim Haroun, Yuan‐Chia Hsu, Da‐Chiang Chang, Calvin Plett

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia-Pacific Microwave Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReturn lossMicrostripRat-race couplerCoplanar waveguideMaterials scienceElectrical impedanceHybrid couplerInsertion lossTransceiverOptoelectronicsFrequency bandElectrical engineeringMicrowaveOpticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)Power dividers and directional couplersEngineeringCMOSAntenna (radio)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A compact reduced size 60-GHz band (57-64 GHz ) 180 degrees coupler is proposed and implemented in an IPD (Integrated Passive Devices) technology. A size reduction of 75% compared to a conventional 180 degrees coupler has been obtained by using high impedance lower-ground coplanar waveguide (LG-CPW) transmission lines loaded with microstrip opencircuited stubs. The measured results of the coupler showed an amplitude imbalance of less than 0.5 dB and a phase variation from 187 degrees to 184 degrees over a frequency range of 57-64 GHz. The measured return loss is better than 15 dB and the isolation is greater than 24 dB over the frequency band of interest. The measured results confirm the potential of the proposed coupler for low-cost, high-performance, small-size transceiver front-ends for high data rate wireless systems operating in the unlicensed 60-band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsia-Pacific Microwave ConferenceSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207