MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521960069 · doi:10.4171/jems/965

Limiting distribution of eigenvalues in the large sieve matrix

2020· preprint· en· W2521960069 on OpenAlexaff
Florin P. Boca, Maksym Radziwiłł

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the European Mathematical Society · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsLambdaCombinatoricsStar (game theory)Distribution (mathematics)Farey sequenceMatrix (chemical analysis)Positive-definite matrixDegenerate energy levelsMathematical analysisPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The large sieve inequality is equivalent to the bound \lambda_1 \leq N + Q^2-1 for the largest eigenvalue \lambda_1 of the N \times N matrix A^*A , naturally associated to the positive definite quadratic form arising in the inequality. For arithmetic applications the most interesting range is N \asymp Q^2 . Based on his numerical data Ramaré conjectured that when N \sim \alpha Q^2 as Q \to \infty for some finite positive constant \alpha , the limiting distribution of the eigenvalues of A^*A , scaled by 1/N , exists and is non-degenerate. In this paper we prove this conjecture by establishing the convergence of all moments of the eigenvalues of A^*A as Q\to\infty . Previously only the second moment was known, due to Ramaré. Furthermore, we obtain an explicit description of the moments of the limiting distribution, and establish that they vary continuously with \alpha . Some of the main ingredients in our proof include the large-sieve inequality and results on n -correlations of Farey fractions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the European Mathematical SocietySame topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207