MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521965996 · doi:10.1107/s2056989016014584

Crystal structure of 2-chloro-1,3-(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1<i>H</i>-imidazol-3-ium tetrakis(3,5-trifluoromethylphenyl)borate

2016· article· en· W2521965996 on OpenAlexaff
Darcie L. Stack, Jason D. Masuda

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicN-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbeneChemistryBoronCrystallographyRing (chemistry)CarboxylateImidazoleCrystal structureCrystal (programming language)TrifluoromethylHydrogen bondMedicinal chemistryAtom (system on chip)MoleculeStereochemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The title compound, C 27 H 38 ClN 2 + ·C 32 H 12 BF 24 − , was synthesized by reacting the product formed from a previous reaction between 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazolinium-2-carboxylate (SIPrCO 2 ), and SOCl 2 , with sodium tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate (NaBARF). In the cation, the imidazole ring is in a half-chair conformation and the formerly carbene carbon atom is bonded in a distorted trigonal–planar geometry with N—C—Cl angles of 122.96 (16) and 122.21 (16)° and an N—C—N angle of 114.83 (18)°. In the crystal, weak C—H...F hydrogen bonds link the cations and anions, forming a three-dimensional network. In addition, a short Cl...F contact of 3.213 Å and several short F...F contacts less than the sum of the van der Waals radii [1.47 Å + 1.47 Å = 2.94 Å] are observed. The F atoms of two of the CF 3 groups were refined as disordered over four sets of sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicN-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207