MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521992880 · doi:10.1115/gt2016-56741

A High-Dimensional Model Representation Guided PSO Methodology With Application on Compressor Airfoil Shape Optimization

2016· article· en· W2521992880 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamodelingParticle swarm optimizationMetaheuristicMathematical optimizationComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)AirfoilParallel metaheuristicBlack boxMulti-swarm optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although metaheuristic techniques have recently become popular in optimization, still they are not suitable for computationally expensive real-world problems, specifically when the problems have many input variables. Among these techniques, particle swarm optimization (PSO) is one of the most well-known population-based nature-inspired algorithms which can intelligently search huge spaces of possible arrangements of design variables to solve various complex problems. The candidate solutions and accordingly the required number of evaluated particles, however, dramatically increase with the number of design variables or the dimension of the problem. This study is a major modification to an original PSO for using all previously evaluated points aiming to increase the computational efficiency. For this purpose, a metamodeling methodology appropriate for so-called high-dimensional, expensive, black-box (HEB) problems is used to efficiently generate an approximate function from all particles calculated during the optimization process. Following the metamodel construction, a term named metamodeling acceleration is added to the velocity update formula in the original PSO algorithm using the minimum of the metamodel. The proposed strategy is called the metamodel guided particle swarm optimization (MGPSO) algorithm. The superior performance of the approach is compared with original PSO using several benchmark problems with different numbers of variables. The developed algorithm is then used to optimize the aerodynamic design of a gas turbine compressor blade airfoil as a challenging HEB problem. The simulation results illustrated the MGPSO’s capability to achieve more accurate results with a considerably smaller number of function evaluations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it