MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 17: Racial and Ethnic Differences in Outcomes in Older Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

2013· article· en· W2522002685 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Qian, Gregg C. Fonarow, Eric E. Smith, Ying Xian, Wenqin Pan, Edward L. Hannan, Benjamín A. Shaw, Laurent G. Glance, Eric D. Peterson, Adrian F. Hernandez, Lee H. Schwamm, Deepak L. Bhatt

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEthnic groupStroke (engine)DemographyMortality rateAcute strokeNon-Hispanic whitesWhite (mutation)GerontologyInternal medicineMexican americans

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Past studies suggest racial and ethnic differences in quality of care and in-hospital outcomes for acute ischemic stroke. Using the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) registry linked to Medicare claims data, we examined whether 30-day and 1-year outcomes differed by race or ethnicity in those aged 65+ with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: We analyzed 200,900 acute ischemic stroke patients age 65 years or older (170,694 non-Hispanic whites, 85.0%; 20,514 non-Hispanic blacks, 10.2%; 6632 Hispanics, 3.3%; 3060 Asian Americans, 1.5%) from 926 U.S. centers participating in the GWTG-stroke program between 2003 and 2008. Both 30-day and 1-year unadjusted and risk adjusted outcomes from admission were examined. Results: Compared with whites, other racial and ethnic groups were on average younger and had higher median score on NIH stroke scale (NIHSS). There were significant racial and ethnic differences in 30-day unadjusted mortality rate (white: 15.0%, black: 9.9%, Hispanic: 11.9%, Asian: 11.1%), 1-year unadjusted mortality rate (white: 31.7%, black: 28.6%, Hispanic: 28.1%, Asian: 23.9%), and 1-year unadjusted all-cause rehospitalization after discharge (white: 54.7%, black: 62.5%, Hispanic: 60.0%, Asian: 48.6%). A slightly increasing trend for 30-day and 1-year unadjusted mortality from admission was observed in the overall sample. White patients had the highest unadjusted and risk adjusted 30-day mortality. By 1 year, white, black, and Hispanic patients all had similar adjusted outcomes yet Asian patients had persistently better results. With regard to 1-year all-cause rehospitalization rates, relative to whites, blacks and Hispanics had higher adjusted 1-year all-cause and stroke associated rehospitalization rates whereas Asians had lower adjusted rates (see Table). Conclusion: White older ischemic stroke patients have the highest 30-day mortality rates of any race/ethnicity group. By one year, only Asian patients have differentially lower mortality risk. In contrast, black and Hispanic patients have higher readmission risk to one year. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.822

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207