Vehicle yaw stability control using active rear steering: Development and experimental validation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a novel pulse active steering system for improving vehicle yaw stability is developed. In the proposed method, pulses are sent to the steerable rear wheels whenever the error between the expected and actual yaw rate is outside a predetermined range. The proposed method and its performance are verified experimentally by full vehicle testing. For this purpose, a simplified vehicle model and a rear suspension model are developed. Vehicle stability is investigated and the steering pulse parameters on the vehicle’s stability are studied. A control system is designed and numerical simulations are performed. Moreover, the active rear steering system is implemented on a Lexus for performing road experiments. Results from simulations and experiments indicate that considerable improvement in the yaw stability performance can be achieved by the proposed system. The proposed method is more cost effective and simpler for vehicle stability control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it