The transmuted generalized modified Weibull distribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada EM provost@stats.uwo.ca AU Ortega Edwinm M. AF Universidade de S?o Paulo, Departamento de Ci?ncias Exatas, Piracicaba, Brazil EM edwin@usp.br KW Generalized modifiedWeibull distribution % Goodness-of-fit statistic % Lifetime data % Transmuted family % Weibull distribution KR nema A profusion of new classes of distributions has recently proven useful to applied statisticians working in various areas of scientific investigation. Generalizing existing distributions by adding shape parameters leads to more flexible models. We define a new lifetime model called the transmuted generalized modified Weibull distribution from the family proposed by Aryal and Tsokos [1], which has a bathtub shaped hazard rate function. Some structural properties of the new model are investigated. The parameters of this distribution are estimated using the maximum likelihood approach. The proposed model turns out to be quite flexible for analyzing positive data. In fact, it can provide better fits than related distributions as measured by the Anderson-Darling (A*) and Cram?r-von Mises (W*) statistics, which is illustrated by applying it to two real data sets. It may serve as a viable alternative to other distributions for modeling positive data arising in several fields of science such as hydrology, biostatistics, meteorology and engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".