Parametric study of H-Darrieus vertical-axis turbines using CFD simulations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A parametric study of vertical axis turbines of the H-Darrieus type is conducted using state-of-the-art Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and the k-ω Shear Stress Transport RANS model in its unsteady form. Although most parameters have previously been investigated individually, the effect of solidity, number of blades, tip speed ratio, Reynolds number, fixed blade pitch angle, and blade thickness on the aerodynamic efficiency of the turbine is evaluated using the same performance evaluation set-up in order to determine what would be the best aerodynamic configuration and operation parameter in a given application. The quantitative impact of 3D effects associated with the blade aspect ratio and the use of end-plates is also investigated. For high-Reynolds applications, optimal radius-based solidity is found to be around σ=0.2, while higher solidities show a lower maximum efficiency than what was previously published using simpler streamtube based methods. In 3D, a small blade aspect ratio (AR=7) leads to a relative efficiency drop of nearly 60% compared to the 2D prediction. Longer blades improve the 3D efficiency greatly. End-plates are found to have a positive effect on power extraction performances, as long as their size and thus their drag are limited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it