MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2522086741 · doi:10.1002/brb3.579

<scp>fMRI</scp>functional connectivity of the periaqueductal gray in<scp>PTSD</scp>and its dissociative subtype

2016· article· en· W2522086741 on OpenAlexafffund
Sherain Harricharan, Daniela Rabellino, Paul Frewen, Maria Densmore, Jean Théberge, Margaret C. McKinnon, Allan N. Schore, Ruth A. Lanius

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain and Behavior · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonHomewood Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDissociativePeriaqueductal grayDepersonalizationTemporoparietal junctionPsychologyNeuroscienceDerealizationFunctional connectivityInsulaDefault mode networkClinical psychologyCentral nervous systemCognitionPrefrontal cortex

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with hyperarousal and active fight or flight defensive responses. By contrast, the dissociative subtype ofPTSD, characterized by depersonalization and derealization symptoms, is frequently accompanied by additional passive or submissive defensive responses associated with autonomic blunting. Here, the periaqueductal gray (PAG) plays a central role in defensive responses, where the dorsolateral (DL‐PAG) and ventrolateralPAG(VL‐PAG) are thought to mediate active and passive defensive responses, respectively. Methods We examinedPAGsubregion (dorsolateral and ventrolateral) resting‐state functional connectivity in three groups:PTSDpatients without the dissociative subtype (n = 60);PTSDpatients with the dissociative subtype (n = 37); and healthy controls (n = 40) using a seed‐based approach via PickAtlas andSPM12. Results AllPTSDpatients showed extensiveDL‐ andVL‐PAGfunctional connectivity at rest with areas associated with emotional reactivity and defensive action as compared to controls (n = 40). Although allPTSDpatients demonstratedDL‐PAGfunctional connectivity with areas associated with initiation of active coping strategies and hyperarousal (e.g., dorsal anterior cingulate; anterior insula), only dissociativePTSDpatients exhibited greaterVL‐PAGfunctional connectivity with brain regions linked to passive coping strategies and increased levels of depersonalization (e.g., temporoparietal junction; rolandic operculum). Conclusions These findings suggest greater defensive posturing inPTSDpatients even at rest and demonstrate that those with the dissociative subtype show unique patterns ofPAGfunctional connectivity when compared to those without the subtype. Taken together, these findings represent an important first step toward identifying neural and behavioral targets for therapeutic interventions that address defensive strategies in trauma‐related disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations125
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain and BehaviorSame topicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207