MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2522427612 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2016.2611669

Improved Coarse Timing Estimation in OFDM Systems Using High-Order Statistics

2016· article· en· W2522427612 on OpenAlexaff
Hamed Abdzadeh-Ziabari, Wei‐Ping Zhu, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersymbol interferenceOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingFadingComputer scienceFalse alarmMultipath propagationPreambleRobustness (evolution)AlgorithmCarrier frequency offsetFrequency offsetStatisticsElectronic engineeringMathematicsDecoding methodsEstimatorTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate new methods for preamble-aided coarse timing estimation in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing systems. Two novel timing metrics using high-order statistics-based correlation and differential normalization functions are first proposed. The performance of the new timing metrics is then evaluated using different criteria, including class separability, robustness to the carrier frequency offset, and computational complexity. It is shown that the new timing metrics can considerably increase the class separability due to their more distinct values at correct and wrong timing instants, and thus give a significantly better detection performance as compared with the existing timing metrics. Furthermore, a new method for coarse estimation of the start of the frame is proposed, which remarkably reduces the probability of intersymbol interference (ISI). The improved performances of the new schemes in multipath fading channels are shown by the probabilities of false alarm, missed detection, and ISI obtained through computer simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207