L’introduction de l’éducation relative à l’environnement par le biais d’institutions internationales participe-t-elle à la co-construction de la rénovation de systèmes scolaires nationaux ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La mise en œuvre d’un projet international alimente une recherche-intervention qui en retour favorise l’ancrage et la pérennisation des objectifs et activités prévus dans le contexte du projet. Cette recherche démontre la nécessité d’effectuer une analyse institutionnelle sérieuse et d’intervenir aux différents niveaux si on veut intégrer de nouvelles stratégies éducatives, notamment celles de l’éducation relative à l’environnement (ErE) dans les systèmes scolaires des pays. Elle met également en évidence l’important travail de médiation que requiert toute approche participative. À tous les moments des actions, une attitude réflexive doit fonder les interventions afin d’assurer leur efficacité et leur ajustement régulier. Le processus réflexif induit a également permis aux acteurs de construire une posture critique qui ne leur était pas familière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".