MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2522518766 · doi:10.1017/s0395264900019247

Des Turcs aux Ḥanafiyya. La construction d’une catégorie « métisse» à Tunis aux XVII<sup>e</sup>et XVIII<sup>e</sup>siècles

2005· article· fr· W2522518766 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sami Bargaoui

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Histoire Sciences Sociales · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Dans l’historiographie de la Tunisie ottomane, les Kūlughlī-s, métis issus de pères turcs et de mères indigènes, forment une catégorie intermédiaire dont le destin politique contribue à expliquer l’avènement du fait national. Un retour plus attentif aux sources et aux catégories des acteurs, montre que les Turcs nés dans la régence, créoles plutôt que métis, ont continué à se désigner comme tels jusqu’au début du XVIII e siècle. Ils se sont inventé alors un nom particulier, Ḥanafiyya, qui les distingue des Turcs de naissance et des Arabes indigènes. Ils se sont également forgé des institutions particulières et une mémoire propre, liée à la fois à l’histoire ottomane et à celle de la province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0290.085
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales Histoire Sciences SocialesSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207