MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2522569004 · doi:10.11159/icbes16.121

Numerical Simulation for the Impact of Various Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Models

2016· article· en· W2522569004 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Taewon Seo, Sun-Young Choi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic aneurysm repair treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAbdominal aortic aneurysmMedicineRadiologyAneurysm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) is a disease with a balloon-shaped dilation of blood vessels occurring in the abdominal aorta.It has been known that the prevalence of AAA occurred about 6~8% in men over the age of 65.AAA usually occurs in the infrarenal abdominal aorta [1].If blood vessels expand abnormally 3 times or more than normal abdominal aortic diameter, the risk of rupture of blood vessel will be increased [2].The main purposes of the study are to investigate the impact of the risk factors of the abdominal aortic aneurysmal geometric models such as aneurysm size, asymmetry, and neck angle in the aorta proximal the aneurysm bulge using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD).Changes in the blood vessel shape due to AAA not only make alteration of the flow characteristic patterns but also will be varied with hemodynamic stresses acting on the vascular wall [3,4].Aneurysmal expansion and the risk of rupture are dependent on the hemodynamic stresses acting on the vessel wall and mechanical stresses.Therefore, it is important to examine the morphological changes of blood flow for the variation in the aneurysm shapes.The parametric study in AAA models is carried out examining effects of the possible risk factors of rupture.The CFD simulations are conducted to analyse the impact of the geometrical shapes such as aneurysm size, asymmetry, and neck angle in the aorta proximal the aneurysm bulge as well as bifurcation angle into the iliac artery.Furthermore, the numerical simulation is performed to understand the impact of the Non-Newtonian effects.The hemodynamic phenomena in AAA vessels are shown by comparing how different compared to the healthy artery.It is found that the neck angle has significant impact on the blood flow patterns and wall shear stress distribution on the surface of AAA.It is also found that the blood flow field in the aorta upstream of the aneurysm is strongly dependent on the AAA geometrical shape.The results show the peak shear stress and the peak pressure within the aneurysm as a function of neck angle, aneurysm size, and asymmetry, respectively.The results of this study provide useful parametric information for the additional diagnostic tool to help clinicians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and ScienceSame topicAortic aneurysm repair treatmentsFrench-language works237,207