L'occupazione di Roma e della città Leonina: rapporti tra santa Sede e autorità italiane dal 20 settembre alla vigilia del plebiscito del 2 ottobre 1870
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the capture of Rome in 1870, the government in Florence pro- posed a solution to the “Roman Question” suggesting that the “Borgo” quarter, known as “città leonina,” bordering the Vatican, be left to the Holy See. The day after the breach of Porta Pia, however, Cardinal An- tonelli requested the Italian army’s occupation of the zone on the right bank of the Tiber, which until then belonged to the papacy, in order to guarantee the safety of the pontiff and the cardinals. The article reconsi- ders the phases of the event and the historiographical interpretations of the decisions made in those hours by analyzing available testimonies and providing new documentary evidence, specifically the unedited drafts of the epistolary correspondence between Antonelli and the Italian general Raffaele Cadorna concerning the presence of the Italian troops in the “cit- tà leonina.” The collection of letters, discovered thanks to the reordering of the archives of Pope Pius XI, focuses above all on the need for the Italian army’s continued occupation of the città leonina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".