MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2522635594 · doi:10.7202/1069432ar

ANDREE KIRCHNER (ED.), INTERNATIONAL MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, INSTITUTIONS, IMPLEMENTATION AND INNOVATIONS, (THE HAGUE, KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY SERIES, VOL. 64, 2003)

2003· article· en· W2522635594 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Deepa Badrinarayana

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de droit international · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational lawLawEnvironmental lawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ANDREE KIRCHNER (ED.), INTERNATIONAL MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, INSTITUTIONS, IMPLEMENTATION AND INNOVATIONS, (THE HAGUE, KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY SERIES, VOL. 64, 2003). An article from journal Revue québécoise de droit international / Quebec Journal of International Law / Revista quebequense de derecho internacional (Volume 16, Number 2, 2003, pp. 1-396), on Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.010
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de droit internationalSame topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207