Иконы Благовещенского собора Сольвычегодска по архивным документам и соборным описям конца XVI–XIX веков
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents the results of a studying of icons of the Annunciation Cathedral in Sol’vychegodsk city. The Cathedral, built in the late 16th century, belonged to the famous Stroganov family. In the first quarter of the 19th century in the process of reconstructions and the sales of the liturgical utensils and icons, interior of the Cathedral has lost integrity. On the basis of the inventories of church property, the author of the article made an attempt to reconstruct the appearance of the interior of the Cathedral. The oldest church inventory of the end of the 16th century, and later inventories of the 19th century, were used for analysis. A comparison of texts inventories and information of the other archival documents made it possible to see the changes taking place in the Cathedral for three centuries, and to determine the extent of participation of several Stroganov generations in the formation of its decoration. The article has a number of the individual characteristics of the interior design program of the Annunciation Cathedral, considered some of the iconography of ancient icons, defines the place of icons in the main church and its aisles, now defunct. It studied in detail the reasons and the ways of moving Sol’vychegodsk icons in the 19th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".