Development and validation of a novel single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel for genetic analysis of Blastomyces spp. and association analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping is increasingly being utilized for molecular typing of pathogens and is cost-effective, especially for large numbers of isolates. The goals of this study were 1) to develop and validate a SNP assay panel for genetic analysis of Blastomyces spp., 2) ascertain whether microsatellite genotyping and the SNP genotyping with the developed panel resolve identical genetic groups, and 3) explore the utility of SNPs for examining phylogenetic and virulence questions in humans. METHODS: Three hundred sixty unique Blastomyces spp. isolates previously genotyped with microsatellite markers were genotyped with the MassARRAY® SNP genotyping system (Agena Bioscience™, San Diego, CA), for a custom panel of 28 SNPs. Clinical presentation data was analyzed for association with SNP variants. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-three Blastomyces spp. isolates (90 %) were successfully genotyped by SNP analysis, with results obtained for at least 27 of 28 assays. For 99.7 % of isolates tested by both genotyping methods, microsatellite genetic group assignment correlated with species assignment based on internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) genotyping, with Group 1 (Gr 1) being equivalent to B. gilchristii and Group 2 (Gr 2) being equivalent to B. dermatitidis. Thirteen isolates were genetic hybrids by one or both methods of genotyping and were difficult to assign to a particular genetic group or species. Fifteen SNP loci showed significantly different alleles in cases of pulmonary vs disseminated disease, at a p-value of <0.01 or less. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest genotyping study of Blastomyces spp. isolates and presents a new method for genetic analysis with which to further explore the relationship between the genetic diversity in Blastomyces spp. and clinical disease presentation. We demonstrated that microsatellite Gr 1 is equivalent to B. gilchristii and Gr 2 is equivalent to B. dermatitidis. We also discovered potential evidence of infrequent recombination between the two Blastomyces spp. Several Blastomyces spp. SNPs were identified as associated with dissemination or pulmonary disease presentation, but additional work is needed to examine virulence SNPs separately within B. dermatitidis and B. gilchristii.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".