Seismic behavior of steel plate shear walls with different configurations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
C walling system consisting of two skins of profiled steel sheeting and an infill of concrete is novel form of construction. Such walling system has great potential to be used as gravity and lateral load resisting elements in buildings. The strength, stiffness, ductility and energy absorbing capacity of composite walls subjected to axial, monotonic/cyclic shear and impact loadings will be described based on comprehensive experimental and theoretical investigations. The fire durability of the walls subjected to high temperatures will also be presented based on residual strength/stiffness/energy absorption capacity. The innovative feature of such walls is the use of new engineered high performance concretes (HPCs) with high strength, high ductility (strain hardening capacity) and micro-cracking characteristics developed at Ryerson University for the last few years. Such HPC composite walls have shown superior performance compared to those made with traditional concrete in terms of strength, ductility, energy absorbing capacity and durability as well as post-impact strength/stiffness/ energy absorbing capacity. Analytical models/design equations for the load resistance of composite walls are developed and their performance validated through experimental and finite element modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".