MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2522952182 · doi:10.1109/csndsp.2016.7573992

Adaptive transmitter load size using receiver harvested energy prediction by Kalman filter

2016· article· en· W2522952182 on OpenAlexaff
Khalil Saidi, Wessam Ajib, Mounir Boukadoum

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterKalman filterComputer sciencePayload (computing)Transmission (telecommunications)Energy (signal processing)Extended Kalman filterFilter (signal processing)WirelessControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringReal-time computingTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer networkMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)StatisticsArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assuming a point-to-point communication between wireless nodes that harvest ambient energy for operation, this work presents a method that uses a Kalman filter to predict the receiver state of charge. This prediction is performed at the transmitter in order to dynamically adjust the number of bits to be sent so as to avoid data loss due to potential receiver battery depletion. Our simulations, using both a simulated and an actual energy profile, show efficient prediction par the Kalman filter and improved transmission efficiency in terms of the number of time slots needed to transmit a given payload.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207