MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2522998677 · doi:10.11159/eee16.133

Magnetic Field Exposures due to Underground Power Cables: A Simulation Study

2016· article· en· W2522998677 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kayhan Ateş, H. Feza Carlak, Şükrü Özen

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAkdeniz Üniversitesi
KeywordsMagnetic fieldField (mathematics)Power (physics)Environmental scienceElectrical engineeringComputer scienceNuclear engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In urban areas, underground power cable utilizations have been increasing dramatically due to increasing energy demand. However, the magnetic ifelds around the underground power cables may cause harmful effects on human health. In this study, the induced magnetic field strengths and current densities caused by underground cables on a human body model are presented. The analytical and simulation studies are implemented using a two-dimensional cylindrical model. Magnetic flux and induced current density levels are obtained for the realistic body model. Results are evaluated according to the magnetic field exposure limits and standards for the body tissue. The solution proposals and techniques for the magnetic field mitigation are presented on behalf of the human health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and ScienceSame topicElectromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsFrench-language works237,207