Unsteady Force on Multi-Stage and Multi-Passage Turbine Long Blade Rows Induced by Wet-Steam Flows
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At the 2015 ASME Turbo Expo in Montreal, we presented a paper on unsteady three-dimensional wet-steam flow simulations for the last three stages of a low-pressure real steam turbine. We then focused on the investigation of unsteady wetness in the three-stage blade passages, which was conducted by assuming the same number of blades in the previous study and the real blade number. The obtained results showed that wetness is definitively influenced by the blade number difference between the stator and the rotor. This paper presents a numerical investigation of unsteady pressure forces on the multi-stage blade rows caused by stator-rotor interactions, which include unsteady wakes, vortices, shocks, and wetness. In particular, we investigate the effect of blade number variation on the pressure forces. Our results indicate that unsteady pressure forces are significantly influenced by shocks from the upstream stator trailing edges transferred to the adjacent rotor blade noses. We finally found that the unsteady pressure forces on the rotor blades are strongly influenced by shocks from upstream stator trailing edges near the hub region and the forces result in a time-dependent torque difference between neighboring two rotor blades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it