MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2523071831 · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.12429

Targeted disruption of the mouse protein phosphatase <i>ppm1l</i> gene leads to structural abnormalities in the brain

2016· letter· en· W2523071831 on OpenAlexaff
Rie Kusano, Kousuke Fujita, Yasuharu Shinoda, Yuko Nagaura, Hiroshi Kiyonari, Abe Takaya, Toshio Watanabe, Yasuhisa Matsui, Masahiro Fukaya, Hiroyuki Sakagami, Tatsuya Sato, J. Funahashi, Motoko Ohnishi, Shinri Tamura, Takayasu Kobayashi

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
FundersMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsForebrainPhosphataseBiologyProtein phosphatase 2Cell biologyCeramideCentral nervous systemNeurosciencePhosphorylationGeneticsApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PPM1L, a member of the metal‐dependent protein phosphatase (PPM) family, is involved in regulating the stress‐activated protein kinase pathway and ceramide trafficking. However, the physiological function of PPM1L in the brain is unclear. In this study, we generated and analyzed ppm1l‐deficient mice in order to investigate PPM1L functions in the brain. Our results indicate that ppm1l is highly expressed in the central nervous system during mouse development and that ppm1lΔ/Δ mice display impaired motor performance and morphological abnormalities in the forebrain. Electron microscopic and immunohistochemical analyses suggest that these abnormalities are due to impaired axonal tract formation. Our novel findings suggest an important role for PPM1L in brain development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesFrench-language works237,207