Potential Health Care Worker Contamination from Ebola Virus Disease during Personal Protective Equipment Removal and Disposal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The transmission of Ebola Virus (EV) to health care workers (HCW) has been documented in highly-resourced care settings, even with HCW use of personal protective equipment (PPE). This research describes an observational study involving simulated Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) patient scenarios in four tertiary acute care centers. Researchers recorded and analyzed audiovisual data to identify instances of potential HCW EV contamination. Video-analysis was based on a coding taxonomy developed in collaboration with Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) professionals. The analysis focused on events and actions associated with potential HCW contamination during doffing and PPE disposal, and contributing system factors. The events and actions identified included out-of-sync doffing teams, HCW deviations from doffing protocols, and improper disposal of doffed PPE including the compression of PPE in biomedical waste containers containing potentially contaminated sharps. These observations are discussed along with recommendations for the re-design of doffing procedural aids and waste disposal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".