MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2523336713

Structure of casein micelle dispersions during ultrafiltration process, probed by In-situ SAXS.

2008· preprint· en· W2523336713 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frédéric Pignon, G. Belina, Theyencheri Narayanan, Xavier Paubel, Albert Magnin, Geneviève Gésan-Guiziou

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2008
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProteins in Food Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmall-angle X-ray scatteringMicelleMaterials scienceUltrafiltration (renal)MembraneRheologyMicrofiltrationChemical engineeringSkimmed milkChromatographyCreamingCaseinAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CrystallographyChemistryScatteringComposite materialEmulsionOrganic chemistryOptics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stability and mechanism underlying the formation of deposits of casein micelles during ultrafiltration process were investigated by small-angle and ultra small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS and USAXS). The casein micelle dispersions consisted of phospho-caseinate model powders and fresh skimmed milk and the measurements probed length scales ranging from 1 to 2000 nm. Rheometric and frontal filtration measurements were combined with SAXS to establish the relationship between the rheological behavior of deposits (shear and/or compression) and the corresponding microstructure. The results obtained clearly demonstrate that the equilibrium structure of casein micelles is globular with a radius of gyration (Rg ~ 100 nm). The internal structure of the micelles is more likely an unfolded state of the constituent proteins rather than globular sub-micelles (Fig. 2). In-situ ultrafiltration experiments under SAXS relate the reduction in the filtration rate to the evolution of microstructure near the membrane. The specific resistance shows a quick linear increase before slowing down. Correspondingly, the scattering pattern in the close vicinity of the membrane becomes anisotropic for long times filtration (Fig. 1) indicating the deformation of the globular micelles. From absolute SAXS intensities, the concentration of the micelles in the deposit can be deduced reliably. INTRODUCTION In the dairy industry, the ultrafiltration process is widely used for the fractionation of skimmed milk. One of the main limitations of the membrane separation performance is the accumulation of matter at the membrane surface. Previous work1 concerning the microfiltration of skimmed milk showed that the transition from stable filtration flux to unstable condition is mainly governed by the formation of a deposit on the membrane. Consequently, it is of capital interest to understand the mechanisms of deposit formation, its structural arrangement and its rheological behavior in order to be able to predict its apparition, to control and to reduce its effects2. Furthermore, in order to assess the filtration performance and to elucidate the limits of the stability zone, the structural properties of the deposits must be combined with permeation measurements and the determination of reversibility condition. In the case of skimmed milk, an important aspect need to be considered is the structure of casein micelles itself, which are primarily aggregates consisting of caseins (main proteins of milk) and minerals. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Static structure of casein micelles The casein micelles dispersions (mass concentration of casein micelles (fm)) were prepared from fresh skimmed milk, purified condensed native phosphocaseinate micelles containing 84.5% of native micellar casein (PPCN) and weakly denatured skimmed milk powder (Low Heat) containing soluble proteins and mineral salts in addition to 28.5% of micellar casein. Adequate suspending phases have been used to obtain the static structure of the native casein micelles investigated by SAXS and USAXS measurements (Fig. 2). In a first approach2, the analysis of the scattering intensity of these casein micelles has been performed using the unified fit function given by Beaucage. The scattering intensity I(q) over the low q branch (corresponding to the larger structure) was fitted by a Debye-Büche function decaying by a q-4 power law. This clearly demonstrates that the larger units consist of globular micelles. The high q region showed a significantly different behavior with I(q) decreasing like q-2.6. If the scattering intensity would originate only from entangled chain like-conformation of proteins, the scattering intensity should follow a q-2 power law decay. The observed power law exponent could be attributed to the scattering due to nanometric calcium phosphate particles reticulated in the protein matrix. Consequently, the results of these SAXS experiments suit well with a model which describes casein micelles as a relatively uniform matrix containing a disordered micelle calcium phosphate3. In situ SAXS during ultrafiltration process Frontal filtration cells were specially developed to probe the microstructure of deposits by SAXS during the separation process with an accuracy of 0.1 mm. In-situ filtration experiments relate the reduction in the filtration rate to the evolution of microstructure near the membrane. The 2D SAXS patterns (Fig. 1) are noticeably anisotropic very close to the membrane (z = 0.2 mm) indicating the deformation of the globular micelles by the applied filtration pressure. From the absolute SAXS intensities, the concentration profile and the anisotropy as a function of the distance z to the membrane can be deduced reliably2. These results suggests that the mechanisms responsible for the reduction of permeation flux is a cumulative effect of a high increase of concentration and of the deformation of the micelles in the immediate vicinity of the membrane4. REFERENCES 1. Gésan-Guiziou G., Boyaval E., and Daufin G., Journal of Membrane. Science, 158 211-222 (1999). 2. Pignon F., Belina G., Narayanan T., Paubel X., Magnin A. and Gésan-Guiziou G., Journal of Chemical Physics, 121(16) 8138-8146 (2004). 3. Holt C., de Kruif C.G., Tuinier R., and Timmins P.A., Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 213, 275 (2003). 4. Belina G., Ph.D. presented at the Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble France, (2005).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicProteins in Food SystemsFrench-language works237,207