MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2523563512 · doi:10.1115/gt2016-56280

Mesoscopic Modeling of 3D Four-Directional Braided Composites

2016· article· en· W2523563512 on OpenAlexaff
Rongqiao Wang, Long Zhang, Dianyin Hu, Xiuli Shen, Jun Song

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 6: Ceramics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Education; Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersAviation Science FundNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEllipseMaterials scienceMesoscopic physicsFiberFiber bundleStiffnessCross section (physics)BundleComposite materialPaddingFiber-reinforced compositeStructural engineeringGeometryMathematicsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3D four-directional braided composites are becoming widely used in the aeroengines due to their excellent transverse properties such as stiffness, strength, fracture toughness and damage resistance. In spite of great achievements in composite materials, the model of 3D four-directional braided composites gives rise to considerable challenge in establishing interior fiber bundle structure which is curved and twisted in jamming condition. Original circular cross-section of fiber bundle is squeezed into oval shape ellipse in manufacturing process of the jamming action. Thus, a novel mesoscopic modeling approach for 3D four-directional braided composites was proposed in this study, which considered the fiber bundle cross-section’s deformation. Firstly, an analytic equation to describe the transformation of fiber bundle cross-section was established based on the equal area of the ellipse and circle. Secondly, the parameters of this equation were achieved using the Matlab simulation. It was concluded that the compacted, non-interfered fiber bundle model constructed was in good agreement with actual structure. This paper provides the mathematical relationship between braiding parameters and geometric dimensions of unit cell model. Numerical results showed that the value of braiding pitch length has a relative calculation error less than 4% compared with test data. The modeling technique lays a foundation for further mesomechanics investigation on 3D four-directional braided composites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 6: Ceramics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Education; Manufacturing Materials and MetallurgySame topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207