MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2523571328 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1613225113

Optimal activation of Fc-mediated effector functions by influenza virus hemagglutinin antibodies requires two points of contact

2016· article· en· W2523571328 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul E. Leon, Wenqian He, Caitlin E. Mullarkey, Mark Bailey, Matthew S. Miller, Florian Krammer, Peter Palese, Gene S. Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University Medical Centre
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEffectorHemagglutinin (influenza)AntibodyBiologyIsotypeVirologyCell biologyVirusFunction (biology)Fc receptorInfluenza A virusAntibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicityImmunologyMonoclonal antibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance The mechanism of how antiviral antibodies induce Fc–FcγR effector functions remains to be fully elucidated. Although the ability to activate effector functions is attributed to antibody isotype, this does not fully address why identical isotypes have different capabilities to stimulate effector function. We show that antibodies that target the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) require a second intermolecular interaction to optimally activate effector cells. We demonstrate that the receptor-binding domain of the HA is required to bind to sialic acid expressed on the surface of effector cells to optimize effector cell activation. This finding provides a basic understanding of how an optimal antibody-dependent cell-mediated response against influenza virus is achieved and may allow for better vaccine design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations118
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207