MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2523576980 · doi:10.1111/bph.13628

Understanding how long‐acting β<sub>2</sub>‐adrenoceptor agonists enhance the clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma – an update

2016· review· en· W2523576980 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Newton, Mark A. Giembycz

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Pharmacology · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlucocorticoid receptorGlucocorticoidPharmacologyGene expressionAgonistAsthmaReceptorGeneMedicineBiologyCell biologyChemistryImmunologyInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In moderate‐to‐severe asthma, adding an inhaled long‐acting β2‐adenoceptor agonist (LABA) to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) provides better disease control than simply increasing the dose of ICS. Acting on the glucocorticoid receptor (GR, gene NR3C1), ICSs promote anti‐inflammatory/anti‐asthma gene expression.In vitro, LABAs synergistically enhance the maximal expression of many glucocorticoid‐induced genes. Other genes, including dual‐specificity phosphatase 1(DUSP1) in human airways smooth muscle (ASM) and epithelial cells, are up‐regulated additively by both drug classes. Synergy may also occur for LABA‐induced genes, as illustrated by the bronchoprotective gene, regulator of G‐protein signalling 2 (RGS2) in ASM. Such effects cannot be produced by either drug alone and may explain the therapeutic efficacy of ICS/LABA combination therapies. While the molecular basis of synergy remains unclear, mechanistic interpretations must accommodate gene‐specific regulation. We explore the concept that each glucocorticoid‐induced gene is an independent signal transducer optimally activated by a specific, ligand‐directed, GR conformation. In addition to explaining partial agonism, this realization provides opportunities to identify novel GR ligands that exhibit gene expression bias. Translating this into improved therapeutic ratios requires consideration of GR density in target tissues and further understanding of gene function. Similarly, the ability of a LABA to interact with a glucocorticoid may be suboptimal due to low β2‐adrenoceptor density or biased β2‐adrenoceptor signalling. Strategies to overcome these limitations include adding‐on a phosphodiesterase inhibitor and using agonists of other Gs‐coupled receptors. In all cases, the rational design of ICS/LABA, and derivative, combination therapies requires functional knowledge of induced (and repressed) genes for therapeutic benefit to be maximized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of PharmacologySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207