MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Art of Bwami and Correlated Associations

2009· article· pt· W2523666787 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Corina Rocha

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia Suplemento · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsCégep de l'Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bwami é uma associação de caráter político e religioso existente nas sociedades lega e bembe, situadas no sudeste da R. D. do Congo. A associação bwami tem sua origem nas tradições dos legas e de grupos correlatos. Ela existe em território lega e bembe e é fundamentada nos mesmos princípios estruturais, embora com divergências marcantes na nomenclatura, nas regras de organização e tipos de acessórios e objetos usados nos rituais de iniciação. Neste trabalho, apresentamos um estudo da produção material relacionada aos rituais de iniciação da bwami e de associações similares. Nosso estudo baseia-se na obra de Daniel Biebuyck, especialista no tema

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.079
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.079
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0050.029
Scholarly communication0.0090.011
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia SuplementoSame topicAfrican Studies and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207