« Laisser le travail au travail ». La relation d’aide en rééducation des adolescent-e-s
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La relation d’aide en centre d’accueil pour adolescent-e-s part d’un désir d’aider des jeunes qui traversent d’importantes difficultés. Quels que soient les motifs qui les conduisent au centre d’accueil, ces jeunes sont dans un état de privation ou de souffrance qui leur fait souvent rejeter l’aide offerte. La relation d’aide s’établit donc dès le départ sur des bases affectives évidentes. Sous de nombreux aspects, cette dynamique affective est influencée par le contexte institutionnel : statut d’emploi, sexe, contenu de la tâche, règles d’organisation de vie, rapports sociaux entre catégories de personnel, contraintes légales, etc. À terme, l’ensemble de cette dynamique entraîne des conséquences pour la nature de l’investissement, la relation à l’activité de travail et le désir de rester dans la profession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".