MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2523961534 · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2016.7577113

Performance evaluation of experimental damage detection in structure health monitoring using acceleration

2016· article· en· W2523961534 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Elsersy, Khalid Abualsaud, Tarek Elfouly, Mohamed Mahgoub, Mohamed H. Ahmed, Marwa Ibrahim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccelerometerStructural health monitoringWireless sensor networkBridge (graph theory)AccelerationEarthquake shaking tableComputer scienceWirelessTable (database)Real-time computingEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsStructural engineeringPhysicsComputer networkData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are one of the emerging technologies in the 21 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">st</sup> century. In the structural health monitoring (SHM). WSNs are used as one of the vitally capable technologies in the SHM. The accelerometer module in the existing sensor nodes enables several novel applications. In this paper, a prototype for monitoring and detecting the damage for the real bridge using these sensor nodes is built. The prototype consists of sensor nodes, shaking table including its amplifier, and real bridge. The sensors are placed on a scaled down concrete bridge model that is mounted on a shaking table. The results are demonstrated in terms of acceleration on different nodes at a particular excitation frequency in the case of normal, single-side damage, and double-side damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207