MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524022956 · doi:10.82308/47013

Optimization techniques for distributed logic simulation

2011· article· en· W2524022956 on OpenAlexaff
Qing Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRollbackCorrectnessLogic simulationScheduling (production processes)WorkstationDiscrete event simulationParallel computingSynchronization (alternating current)Distributed computingLogic gateReal-time computingSimulationAlgorithmEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gate level simulation is a necessary step to verify the correctness of a circuitdesign before fabrication. It is a very time-consuming application, especially in lightof current circuit sizes. Since circuits are continually growing in size and complexity,there is a need for more efficient simulation techniques to keep the circuit verificationtime acceptably small. The use of parallel or distributed simulation is such a technique.When executed on a network of workstations, distributed simulation is alsoa very cost-effective technique. This research focuses on optimization techniques forTime Warp based gate-level logic simulations. The techniques which are described inthis thesis are oriented towards distributed platforms. The first major contributionof this thesis was the creation of an object oriented distributed simulator, XTW. Ituses an optimistic synchronization algorithm and incorporates a number of knownoptimization techniques targeting different aspects of distributed logic simulation.XEQ, an O(1) event scheduling algorithm for this simulator was developed for usein XTW. XEQ enabled us to execute gate level simulations up to 9.4 times fasterthan the same simulator using a skip-list (O(lg n)) event queue. rb-messagea mechanism which reduces the cost of rollback in Time Warp was also developedfor use in XTW. Our experiments revealed that the rb-message mechanism reducedthe number of anti-messages sent in a Time Warp based logic simulation by 76%on average. Moreover, based on the observations that (1)not all circuits should besimulated in parallel and (2) different circuits achieve their best parallel simulationperformance with a different number of compute nodes, an algorithm that uses theK-NN machine learning algorithm was devised to determine the most effective softwareand hardware combination for a logic simulation. After an extensive trainingregime, it was shown to make a correct prediction 99% of the time on whether touse a parallel or sequential simulator. The predicted number of nodes to use on aparallel platform was shown to produce an average execution time which was notmore than 12% of the smallest execution time. The configuration which resulted inthe minimal execution time was picked 61% of the time. A final contribution of thisthesis is an effort to link together commercial single processor simulators making useof Verilog PLI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207