MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Role of ICT for Competitiveness: Learning from the Case of Software Industry in India

2005· article· en· W2524056505 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Kirankumar S. Momaya

Bibliographic record

VenueIETE Technical Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsCorporationInformation and Communications TechnologyBusinessManagementMarketingPolitical scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The information and communication technology (ICT) have considerable potential and economic effects. The software industry, a segment of the ICT industry, has attracted enormous mindshare in India. This industry in India has contributed significantly to many stakeholders and brought laurels to the country. There is still vast untapped potential for competitiveness of Bharat. Leveraging the potential will demand all round improvements on many facets of competitiveness. Drawing on rich experiences of competitiveness research covering the West as well as the East, attempt is made here to present a factual perspective on competitiveness reality, taking case of software industry in India. The learning are synthesized and can be adapted in other related industries such as telecom, which have experienced high growth. Finally, implications are drawn for key stakeholders for nurturing competitiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0110.008
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIETE Technical ReviewSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207