MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524120798

LA CULTURE DE L'ÉCRIT: LES DÉFIS À L'ÉCOLE ET AU FOYER (Editor: Diane Masny) reviewed by Denise Lussier, followed by THE EROSION OF DEMOCRACY IN EDUCATION: FROM CRITIQUE TO POSSIBILITIES (Editors: J.P. Portelli & R.P. Solomon) reviewed by Ayaz Naseem

2001· article· fr· W2524120798 on OpenAlexaffabout
Denise Lussier, Ayaz Naseem

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesDemocracySociologyPolitical scienceArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DIANE MASNY (RED.). La culture de l'ecrit. Les defis a l'ecole et au foyer. Montreal: Les Editions LOGIQUES (2001).212 pp. $24.95 (ISBN 2-89381-809-9). J.P. PORTELLI & R.P. SOLOMON (EDS.) The Erosion of Democracy in Education: From critique to possibilities. Calgary: Detselig Enterprises (2001). 328 pp. $26.95 (ISBN 1-55059-214-9).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGillSame topicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political TheoryFrench-language works237,207