Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because the means of communication through which information is conveyed are indispensable for the eradication of poverty, public interest requires that all information and communications technology services must be available at affordable cost in all countries and to all areas within a country. Unfortunately, in spite of numerous international efforts, a digital divide still exists at both the national and international levels. Bridging this divide will be extremely difficult in the near future if the international and national regulatory regimes and approaches applicable to means of communications are not revised. There are many challenges, including access to appropriate national communication facilities, the privatisation of international operators in the field of satellite communications, the provision of domestic services by foreign operators, and the lack of national regulatory frameworks. To improve the situation, the Tunis Phase of the WSIS should ensure that all States and relevant international organisations follow the results of the Summit, and should focus on increasing the human intellectual capacity in regulatory matters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.033 | 0.036 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".