Sounding Place, Performing Knowledge: the exploratory and the performative in the soundscape composition<i>Resounding Reverie</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores the balance between performative and exploratory actions in soundscape composition through a consideration of the author’s fixed media composition, Resounding Reverie. Soundscape composition, particularly in this case, is characterised as an embodied practice expressing both performative and exploratory practices. The creative processes used in making Resounding Reverie show that through embodied interaction with a particular acoustic space, and using audio technologies and attendant gestures as prosthetic practices, the composer initiated exploratory actions that both expressed his habitus and made room for new acoustic discoveries through exploratory ‘groping’ to establish a form of contact with the affordances of this nexus of ‘aural architecture’, technology, and agency. An mp3 recording of Resounding Reverie may be found at the following link: https://andrewczink.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/t1_resounding-reverie_mp3.mp3
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".