MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524262871 · doi:10.1159/000470256

Jugular Venous Flow Velocity Pattern Application to Bedside Recognition of Jugular Venous Pulse Contour and Right Heart Hemodynamics

2017· article· en· W2524262871 on OpenAlexaff
Narasimhan Ranganathan, Vahe Sivaciyan

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Noninvasive Cardiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CentreUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemodynamicsPulse (music)CardiologyInternal medicineAnatomyComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jugular venous flow velocity patterns and their variations reflect right heart hemodynamics and its derangement irrespective of underlying etiology. Since jugular venous flow velocity peaks correspond to the descents in the right atrial pressure pulse, the observations on jugular venous flows are valuable to bedside assessment of jugular venous pulse contour and right heart function. In normal adults, systolic flow (Sf) and the corresponding X' descent caused by the descent of the base is dominant. Although the smaller diastolic flow (Df) is recordable, the corresponding Y descent is not usually seen. Double descents in the jugular venous pulse whether X' > Y, X' = Y or X' < Y, generally arise either because the X' descent is decreased or the Y descent is exaggerated or both, similar to the corresponding flow velocity peaks. Decreased Sf (X' descent) usually reflects decreased right ventricular (RV) contraction as in RV failure in pulmonary hypertension, post-cardiac surgery RV damage and RV infarction. Sf and X' descent diminish in atrial fibrillation due to the loss of the Starling effect of the atrial contraction and rarely in severe mitral regurgitation due to a Bemheim effect on the interatrial septum. The Df (Y descent) gets exaggerated when there is increased V wave pressure- head with no restriction to ventricular filling during the rapid filling phase of diastole as may be seen with high sympathetic tone, hypervolemia, extra source of venous return as in atrial septal defect, pericardial effusion with some restriction, constrictive pericarditis, pulmonary hypertension with elevated RV diastolic pressure, RV infarct and cardiomyopathy. The exaggerated Df and Y descent with normal V wave pressure in post-cardiac surgery patients is explainable by the decreased right atrial capacitance function. In pulmonary hypertension, the jugular venous flow velocity pattern progresses from a compensated state reflected by Sf dominance (X' > Y) to equal Sf and Df (X' = Y) with rising RV pre-A wave pressure, to dominant Df (X' < Y) with onset of RV failure, and eventually to Df alone (single Y descent) with significant RV decompensation. In the absence of pulmonary hypertension, equal Sf and Df (X' = Y) indicates increased V wave pressure with no restriction to rapid filling (except in post-cardiac surgery patients), whereas the dominant Df pattern (X' < Y) indicates decreased RV function. Thus, an understanding of the jugular venous flow velocity pattern is directly applicable to bedside assessment of jugular venous pulse contour and right heart function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Noninvasive CardiologySame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207