KONTESTASI AKSES SUMBER AGRARIA DI KAWASAN HUTAN DODO JARAN PUSANG, KABUPATEN SUMBAWA, NTB -- Contestations Access to Agrarian Resources in Forest Area of Dodo Jaran Pusang, Sumbawa District, NTB
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Control and management of forests by the Government often gives rise to conflicts with communities, especially those that still utilize forest resources for their lives. This condition also occurs in forest area of Dodo, Jaran Pusang (RTK. 64) in Sumbawa, West Nusa Tenggara. Conflicts in forest area of Dodo involve community in Lawin village and Lebangkar village, sub-district Ropang, local government and the PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara who gained the concession of mining around forest area of Dodo. This research was qualitative research with a descriptive case study strategy. This research explains that the Lebangkar and Lawin community still can access forest of Dodo, indicated by a pattern of economic relations, socio-cultural and ecological of the communities with forest. The community also is constantly working to build power through FKDEL, YEP, SPPT, and SKPT movement to maintain access in the forest of Dodo. On the other hand, the Government of Indonesia, Newmont Nusa Tenggara, Society Ropang, Ranan, Lebin and Johnny wanted to access the forest of Dodo. Every actor has a different way to get access. The difference in the strength of the actor causing relationship tension between concerned actors. Keywords: agrarian contestations, access, Forest of Dodo, Lebangkar, Lawin ABSTRAK Kontrol dan pengelolaan hutan oleh pemerintah sering menimbulkan pertentangan dengan masyarakat, terutama yang masih memanfaatkan sumber daya hutan untuk kehidupan mereka. Kondisi ini juga terjadi di Kawasan Hutan Dodo, Jaran Pusang (RTK.64) di Sumbawa, Nusa Tenggara Barat. Konflik di Kawasan Hutan Dodo melibatkan masyarakat di desa Lawin dan desa Lebangkar, kecamatan Ropang, pemerintah daerah dan PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara yang memperoleh konsesi pertambangan sekitar Kawasan Hutan Dodo. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan startegi studi kasus deskriptif. Penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa masyarakat Lawin dan Lebangkar masih dapat mengkases hutan Dodo yang ditunjukkan dengan pola hubungan ekonomi, sosial-budaya dan ekologi masyarakat dengan hutan. Masyarakat juga terus berupaya membangunpower melalui gerakan FKDEL, YEP, SPPT, dan SKPT untuk mempertahankan akses di hutan Dodo. Di sisi lain, pemerintah Indonesia, Newmont Nusa Tenggara, masyarakat Ropang, Ranan, Lebin dan Lantung ingin mengakses hutan dodo. Setiap aktor memiliki cara yang berbeda untuk mendapatkan akses. Perbedaan kekuatan aktor menyebabkan ketegangan hubungan antara aktor-aktor berkepentingan. Kata kunci: kontestasi graria, akses, Hutan Dodo, Lebangkar, Lawin
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".