MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524275792 · doi:10.7202/1037214ar

La crise de la dette en Europe

2016· article· fr· W2524275792 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alexandre Jeanneret, Elian Chouaib

Bibliographic record

VenueL Actualité économique · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policies and Political Economy
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article offre une analyse de la crise de la dette en Europe. Nous relevons d’abord les origines de la crise en présentant les problèmes structurels de la zone euro et, plus particulièrement, des pays ayant sollicité l’aide de l’Europe. Nous étudions ensuite les différentes réformes qui ont été entreprises par l’Union européenne et certains gouvernements avant d’exposer les risques de contagion auxquels font face les autres membres de l’Union économique et monétaire. Finalement, nous proposons certaines réformes qui peuvent aider à préserver la zone euro et éviter ainsi une nouvelle crise de la dette.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL Actualité économiqueSame topicFiscal Policies and Political EconomyFrench-language works237,207