Monophyly of eusocial wasps (Hymenoptera:Vespidae): molecules and morphology tell opposing histories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studying the transition from solitary to eusocial life in insects has the potential to elucidate long-standing evolutionary questions regarding phenotypic decoupling and altruistic behavior. Phylogenies provide insight into the ancestral states and environmental contexts that subserve worker/queen decoupling, and thus are the framework for understanding origins of eusociality. We present a thorough phylogenetic analysis of the Vespidae, utilizing phenotypic and molecular data of previous studies in conjunction with newly acquired data, in an effort to explain how solitary ancestors may have crossed the threshold of eusociality. Previous studies show conflicting phylogenies for Vespidae, and differ in their conclusions regarding whether eusociality has evolved once or twice in these wasps. The causes of phylogenetic incongruence are numerous and so we postulate the primary drivers of phylogenetic incongruence complicating reconstruction of the Vespidae phylogeny. Simultaneous analysis of phenotypic characters (269 morphological and 66 behavioral) and molecular data (CO1, 28S, 16S, 12S) for 74 taxa supports a (Stenogastrinae + (Polistinae + Vespinae)) clade and thus a single origin of eusociality. Phylogenies derived strictly from molecular evidence place Stenogastrinae as basal and thus support a dual origin of eusociality.Our reanalysis shows that previous studies recovering diphyly of eusocial wasps withstand the effects of low taxon sampling, suboptimal alignments and a two-step approach causing phylogenetic error; we achieved similar topologies using ~three-fold more terminal ingroups and a different suite of loci. All trees derived exclusively from molecular evidence suggest dual origins of eusociality; however, the relative positions of Euparagiinae, Masarinae and Stenogastrinae are inconsistent across the different cladistic methods. Our results show that a portion of phylogenetic incongruence is attributable to method choice, but that the primary driver of incongruence is data type inclusion – that is, the topology produced changes when phenotypic data is included. We conclude that vespid subfamily relationships are obfuscated by the fact that phenotypic and molecular evidence are at odds. Nonetheless, we advocate topologies retrieved from simultaneous analysis of all available evidence. Thus, a single origin of wasp eusociality is the best hypothesis, highlighting the rarity and salience of simultaneous progressive provisioning emergence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".