MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2524313311 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100004844

Re: Methadone in the Management of Intractable Neuropathic Noncancer Pain

2006· letter· fr· W2524313311 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fayez Kotob, Juan-Diego Harris, Oscar A. de León-Casasola

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2006
Typeletter
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Sciences Research and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)Content (measure theory)Computer scienceMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At our institution, we treat a large population of patients with various types of neuropathic pain, and we are in agreement with the conclusion by Moulin, et al. 1 However, we would like to emphasize the importance of establishing a screening program for the early detection of a potential QTc-interval prolongation and the risk of Torsades de Pointes among patients receiving high dose of methadone.As the authors mentioned, it has been suggested that there is a linear correlation between the daily dose of methadone and the QTc interval.2,3 Therefore, we perform a baseline electrocardiographic (ECG) study prior to instituting long-term methadone treatment greater than 120 mg per day. 4 The ECG study is repeated in one month and every three months thereafter.In the face of QTc-interval prolongation, we discontinue the methadone therapy to avoid potential life-threatening dysrhythmias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0150.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicHealth Sciences Research and Education→French-language works237,207→