Elements cles, enjeux et retombees d’une demarche de redaction inclusive realisee avec des adultes ayant de tres faibles competences en litteratie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les personnes présentant une déficience intellectuelle ont souvent de faibles compétences en littératie. Les organisations doivent s’interroger sur les meilleures façons de rendre accessible l’information qui leur est destinée, de rehausser leurs compétences à comprendre les messages et de contribuer aux services qu’ils reçoivent. L’article présente les résultats d’une recherche-action ayant regroupé des concepteurs, des personnes présentant une déficience intellectuelle et leurs accompagnateurs. Ils ont coconstruit du matériel dans le but de le rendre signifiant et compréhensible. Cette coopération a permis d’identifier les éléments clés et les enjeux de la démarche de rédaction inclusive ainsi que ses retombées chez tous les participants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".