MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524352979 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2016.2613401

Compensation Schemes for Transmitter- and Receiver-Based Pattern-Dependent Distortion

2016· article· en· W2524352979 on OpenAlexaff
A. Rezania, John C. Cartledge, Ali Bakhshali, W.-Y. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterCompensation (psychology)Distortion (music)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineeringBandwidth (computing)Channel (broadcasting)Psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nonlinear pre-distorter (NLPD) at the transmitter, and a maximum-a-posteriori probability (MAP) detector, time-domain Volterra nonlinear equalizer (VNLE), or sparse-VNLE at the receiver are compared for compensation of the pattern-dependent distortion that can occur in high baud rate transmitters and receivers. Experimental results are presented for a 1.206-Tb/s dual-polarization 16-ary quadrature amplitude-modulation (16-QAM) superchannel signal with three subcarriers. The NLPD with iterative calculation of the pre-distortion provides the best performance in back-to-back systems and transmission systems followed by the MAP detector, VNLE, and sparse-VNLE. At the FEC threshold of 1.9 × 10-2, the NLPD provides an increase in the transmission distance of 300 km compared with the sparse-VNLE, VNLE, and MAP detector. For transmission over 1500 km of SMF, the VNLE and MAP detector exhibit additional optical signal-to-noise ratio margins of 0.16 and 0.47 dB relative to the sparse-VNLE. Compared with the VNLE, the sparse-VNLE exhibits a 55% reduction in number of kernel coefficients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207