MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524560340 · doi:10.11159/iccpe16.106

Organosolv Modified Wheat Straw as Adsorbent for Basic Dyes in Water Bodies

2016· article· en· W2524560340 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
D.K. Sidiras, Ιωάννα Σαλάπα, Dorothea Politi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganosolvStrawAdsorptionChemistryPulp and paper industryChemical engineeringAgronomyLigninOrganic chemistryEngineeringBiologyInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biomass and especially lignocellulosic residues offer a low-cost and renewable additional source of adsorbents and can be used as is or modified or transformed to activated carbon.These waste materials have little or no economic value and often present a disposal problem.Therefore, there is a drive to valorize these low-cost by-products.Various low-cost adsorbents from agricultural byproducts have been studied to remove dyes from aqueous solutions.In this work, a sulfuric acid-catalyzed organosolv pretreatment process using five organic solvents, i.e., ethanol, methanol, diethylene glycol, acetone and butanol, was applied to modify wheat straw under carefully selected conditions.The low-cost material, i.e., modified wheat straw was used as adsorbent for cleaning of water bodies' pollution.The potentiality of modified wheat straw for the adsorptive removal of Methylene Blue (MB), a representative basic dye, from aqueous solutions was studied.The experimental batch adsorption system data were simulated using (a) Freundlich, Langmuir and Sips isotherm models and (b) first order, second order and intraparticle diffusion kinetic models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207