MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524619889 · doi:10.1080/18756891.2016.1237193

Empirical Comparison of Differential Evolution Variants for Industrial Controller Design

2016· article· en· W2524619889 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Design
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDifferential evolutionDifferential (mechanical device)Computer scienceController (irrigation)Artificial intelligenceBiologyPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To be cost-effective, most commercial off-the-shelf industrial controllers have low system order and a predefined internal structure.When operating in an industrial environment, the system output is often specified by a reference model, and the control system must closely match the model's response.In this context, a valid controller design solution must satisfy the application specifications, fit the controller's configuration and meet a model matching criterion.This paper proposes a method of solving the design problem using bilinear matrix inequality formulation, and the use of Differential Evolution (DE) algorithms to solve the resulting optimization problem.The performance of the proposed method is demonstrated by comparing a set of ten DE variants.Extensive statistical analysis shows that the variants and are effective in terms of mean best objective function value, average number of function evaluations, and objective function value progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it