MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2524644113 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-02/21/1619

Electrodeposited and Oxidized Mn/Co-Fe As Bi-Functional Electrocatalysts for Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries

2016· article· en· W2524644113 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Xiong, Douglas G. Ivey

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)CatalysisOxygen evolutionChemical engineeringMaterials scienceElectrochemistryElectrodeManganeseZincOxideInorganic chemistryChemistryMetallurgyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrochemically rechargeable zinc-air batteries are one of the best candidates to store very large amounts of electrical energy[1]. However, due to the sluggish ORR (oxygen reduction reaction) and OER (oxygen evolution reaction) at the air electrode, the efficiency of zinc-air batteries is comparatively low, leading to energy losses. In addition, the stability of the catalysts is poor because they can peel off or pulverize during battery cycling. The air electrode contains a gas diffusion layer (GDL) as the substrate and a catalyst layer. The key to increasing efficiency and stability is to properly combine catalysts with the GDL to facilitate the ORR and OER. Manganese oxides have been shown to be excellent ORR catalysts, while oxidized Co-Fe performs well in catalyzing OER[2,3]. The proper amalgamation of the two materials may be able to generate a highly efficient bi-functional catalyst that can catalyze both ORR and OER. In this study, Mn and Co-Fe were sequentially electrodeposited onto the GDL and then annealed in air to produce transition metal oxide catalysts. The fabricated material was then assembled into a zinc-air battery as the air electrode component to run battery cycling tests. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) results show that a porous Mn-layer was firstly formed on the GDL and then covered by another layer of Co-Fe nanoparticles (Fig. 1). The nanocomposite structure provides a high surface area for electrochemical reactions. The electrocatalytic properties of the bi-functional catalysts were studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in 6M KOH solution. The CV results demonstrate that the oxidized Mn/Co-Fe nanocomposite exhibits activities for both ORR and OER. Preliminary cell test results show that the discharge-recharge efficiency is increased from 50% to 58% at 10 mA/cm 2 current density when the catalysts are used in the battery. The efficiency can be further improved with optimized catalysts design and fabrication. In addition, the deposited catalyst layer shows strong adhesion to the GDL and excellent stability after 40 hours of battery testing. The influence of electrodeposition conditions on the electrochemical performance is also discussed. References 1. Y. Li and H. Dai, Chemical Society Reviews , 2014, 43 , 5257-5275. 2. K. Zhang, X. Han, Z. Hu, X. Zhang, Z. Tao and J. Chen, Chemical Society Reviews , 2015, 44 , 699-728. 3. J. Ahmed, B. Kumar, A. M. Mugweru, P. Trinh, K. V. Ramanujachary, S. E. Lofland and A. K. Ganguli, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , 2010, 114 , 18779-18784. Fig. 1 SEM image of Co-Fe nanoparticles. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207