THE ILLEGALITY OF FRANCE’S EXPULSIONS OF BULGARIAN AND ROMANIAN ROMA UNDER EUROPEAN UNION LAW
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This contribution will try to answer the question whether and to what degree France has infringed domestic and European law by expulsing Romanian and Bulgarian Roma citizens since the acceptance of both countries into the European Union on January 1, 2007. This paper is divided in two parts. In the first part, the author seeks to demonstrate how the expulsions of Bulgarian and Romanian Roma citizens from France infringe the 2004 Directive on Freedom of Movement of European Union (EU) nationals under EU law. In the second part, the study shows that the curtailment of Bulgarian and Romanian citizens’ freedom of movement infringes those citizens’ rights under European law, namely under the European Social Charter and the European Convention on Human Rights. The rights discussed under the European Convention are the right to respect for private and family life under which is examined the right of housing and children’s right to education. Finally, the author outlines positive practices from France that can be translated into European Union law and adopted by the Member States as one means of ensuring Roma children’s right to education across the European Union.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".