RETINAL DETACHMENT ASSOCIATED WITH PERIPHERAL TEAR OF THE RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIUM IN PACHYCHOROID SPECTRUM DISEASE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe a rare case of an exudative retinal detachment associated with a peripheral tear of the retinal pigment epithelium in a young myopic pachychoroid eye. METHODS: Clinical case report and literature review. Imaging was obtained with color fundus photography, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and fluorescein angiography. RESULTS: A 33-year-old white man presented with an exudative choroidopathy resulting in an exudative neurosensory detachment, associated with peripheral retinal pigment epithelium tears. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography demonstrated a pachychoroid (628 μm) with subfoveal fluid. Despite a secondary pars-plana vitrectomy with silicone oil and later, Densiron-68 (Labtician Ophthalmics Inc) endotamponade, there was an area of persistent subretinal fluid inferiorly. A previously placed scleral buckle was removed, and scleral window surgery performed, with complete resolution of fluid and restoration of vision. Choroidal thickness improved to 333 μm postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Peripheral retinal pigment epithelium tear-associated retinal detachment can be seen in patients with pachychoroid spectrum disease. Scleral window surgery may be considered in the management of these retinal detachments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".