Les dispositifs scolaires québécois et français offerts aux élèves ayant un trouble du spectre de l’autisme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, les auteurs précisent la prévalence, la sévérité et les comorbidités que peuvent montrer les élèves et les étudiants présentant un trouble du spectre de l’autisme, qu’ils soient scolarisés au Québec ou en France. Ils font état des services scolaires qui leur sont fournis et les types de classement dans lesquels ils peuvent évoluer selon leur niveau d’inclusion, comme la classe régulière en école ordinaire, la classe spéciale en école ordinaire et l’école ou le milieu spécialisés, ainsi que la scolarisation post-secondaire ou universitaire. Dans la conclusion, ils rapportent des similitudes entre le Québec et la France, comme la hausse de la prévalence, le droit à la scolarisation en milieu ordinaire et les services professionnels, puis des différences, comme le taux d’élèves scolarisés et la formation des enseignants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".