MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2525322706 · doi:10.1002/macp.201600357

Critically Evaluated Rate Coefficients in Radical Polymerization – 8. Propagation Rate Coefficients for Vinyl Acetate in Bulk

2016· article· en· W2525322706 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Chemistry and Physics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotopolymerization techniques and applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersInternational Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
KeywordsPolymerizationArrhenius equationVinyl acetateRadical polymerizationActivation energyPolymer chemistryMonomerChemistryKineticsPolymerAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Propagation rate coefficient values, k p , reported by several groups for radical polymerization of bulk vinyl acetate are critically evaluated. All data are obtained by the combination of pulsed‐laser polymerization and subsequent polymer analysis by size exclusion chromatography, as recommended by the IUPAC Working Party on Modeling of Polymerization Kinetics and Processes. Although a small (≈15%) increase in k p is observed as laser pulse repetition rate is increased from low (25–100 Hz) to high (300–500 Hz) values, all of the data fulfill the required consistency criteria and thus are combined into a benchmark set covering the temperature range of 5–70 °C. The data are fitted well by an Arrhenius relation resulting in a pre‐exponential factor of 1.35 × 10 7 L mol −1 s −1 and an activation energy of 20.4 kJ mol −1 , with 95% confidence ellipsoids for the parameters also presented. image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it